Files
SSW590-DevOps/devopsAIPromptLog.tex
T

49 lines
2.9 KiB
TeX

\chapter{AI Prompt Log}
\ChapterLabel{AIPromptLog}
\index{AI prompt log}
\index{AI assistance}
\section{Scope of Assistance}
This appendix records the \gls{ai} assistance used in preparing this document,
in the detail needed for a reviewer to see what was requested, what was
returned, and what the author changed. Assistance was used for interpreting the
assignment brief, drafting chapter text, and reviewing the document for internal
consistency. It was not used to generate command output, evidence, or any claim
about work that was not performed. No credential, key, or personal data was
supplied to the tool. Every decision recorded below was made by the author; the assistant's role was
to propose and to check.
\section{Records}
\subsection{Record 1 --- Document Interpretation and Restructuring}
\textbf{Date:} September 17, 2026.\\
\textbf{Tool and model:} Anthropic Claude (Opus 5).\\
\textbf{Task:} Determine what was expected by this assignment given its
instructions and the document template; then identify which parts of the template
belong in a submitted report and trim/modify unnecessary sections.\\
\textbf{Inputs:} The assignment brief and the supplied \LaTeX\ template sources.\\
\textbf{Output used:} Removal of the instructional example chapter and the
template-maintenance appendices; rewritten abstract, introduction, and document
history; corrected document metadata and authorship.\\
\textbf{Human review and corrections:} The assistant explained assignment expectations
and received clarification from the author according to class and lecture content.
The assistant provided a guideline on which template sections should be kept, removed,
or modified. The author identified sections that were erroneously retained and modified
the AI outputs heavily in the final iteration to match the scope of the assignment and lectures so far.
\subsection{Record 2 --- Chapter Drafting}
\textbf{Date:} September 18, 2026.\\
\textbf{Tool and model:} Anthropic Claude (Opus 5).\\
\textbf{Task:} Review the configured Kanban board and draft \ChapterRef{KanbanSetup},
then draft \ChapterRef{Hosts} and \ChapterRef{Passwords} according to the author's plans.
Update the AI log once all changes are finalized.\\
\textbf{Inputs:} A screenshot of the board and its column settings; the
intended platform and naming convention, and the access model already decided
by the author. No passwords, nor their hints or rules, were shared with the assistant.\\
\textbf{Output used:} The Kanban chapter structure, its column policy, and card
inventory tables; the host inventory and its naming convention; the
split of accounts into generated and derived classes.\\
\textbf{Human review and corrections:} The author determined the column policy
and work-in-progress criteria, and rejected a proposal to create a GitHub
organization as premature while teams remain unformalized. Much of the assistant's
wording, structure, and ambitious ideas were rejected for overcomplication.