chore: organize into folders

backmatter/devopsAIPromptLog.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+\chapter{AI Prompt Log}
+\ChapterLabel{AIPromptLog}
+\index{AI prompt log}
+\index{AI assistance}
+
+\section{Scope of Assistance}
+This appendix records the \gls{ai} assistance used in preparing this document,
+in the detail needed for a reviewer to see what was requested, what was
+returned, and what the author changed. Assistance was used for interpreting the
+assignment brief, drafting chapter text, and reviewing the document for internal
+consistency. It was not used to generate command output, evidence, or any claim
+about work that was not performed. No credential, key, or personal data was
+supplied to the tool. Every decision recorded below was made by the author; the assistant's role was
+to propose and to check.
+
+\section{Records}
+ 
+\subsection{Record 1 --- Document Interpretation and Restructuring}
+\textbf{Date:} September 17, 2026.\\
+\textbf{Tool and model:} Anthropic Claude (Opus 5).\\
+\textbf{Task:} Determine what was expected by this assignment given its
+instructions and the document template; then identify which parts of the template
+belong in a submitted report and trim/modify unnecessary sections.\\
+\textbf{Inputs:} The assignment brief and the supplied \LaTeX\ template sources.\\
+\textbf{Output used:} Removal of the instructional example chapter and the
+template-maintenance appendices; rewritten abstract, introduction, and document
+history; corrected document metadata and authorship.\\
+\textbf{Human review and corrections:} The assistant explained assignment expectations
+and received clarification from the author according to class and lecture content.
+The assistant provided a guideline on which template sections should be kept, removed,
+or modified. The author identified sections that were erroneously retained and modified
+the AI outputs heavily in the final iteration to match the scope of the assignment and lectures so far.
+ 
+\subsection{Record 2 --- Chapter Drafting}
+\textbf{Date:} September 18, 2026.\\
+\textbf{Tool and model:} Anthropic Claude (Opus 5).\\
+\textbf{Task:} Review the configured Kanban board and draft \ChapterRef{KanbanSetup},
+then draft \ChapterRef{Hosts} and \ChapterRef{Passwords} according to the author's plans.
+Update the AI log once all changes are finalized.\\
+\textbf{Inputs:} A screenshot of the board and its column settings; the
+intended platform and naming convention, and the access model already decided
+by the author. No passwords, nor their hints or rules, were shared with the assistant.\\
+\textbf{Output used:} The Kanban chapter structure, its column policy, and card
+inventory tables; the host inventory and its naming convention; the
+split of accounts into generated and derived classes.\\
+\textbf{Human review and corrections:} The author determined the column policy
+and work-in-progress criteria, and rejected a proposal to create a GitHub
+organization as premature while teams remain unformalized. Much of the assistant's
+wording, structure, and ambitious ideas were rejected for overcomplication.